Cultural Confederacies

Have you ever wondered that maybe, just maybe things are breaking down at an accelerating rate? If so, maybe we have to stop trying to fix a broken system and start over with a brand new one?

Yeah, I know, this is supposed to be a bolg from the less established press, but I have to hand it to mainstream's Maureen Dowd in the Sunday Times “Boy oh Boy” who got it just about right. The Tea Parties, and the Town Halls the kerfluffel over the President addressing school children are really about one thing, and one thing only. This is all about a big part of the country’s inability to deal with a black guy as President.

I should learn to post faster. This morning, as I am about to put this up, I hear that Jimmy Carter says the same thing, (Yay Jimmy!) so at least it is out there with a bigger microphone than I can muster. The problem is, will we just wring our hands at the awfulness of it all or will we start thinking of new ways of dealing with the issues.

Maybe its time to admit that we should not be living in the same country as these folks who will have no compromise or reason in their position. As William Faulkner reminded us about the South; "The past is never dead. It's not even past." The Confederacy has been waiting 145 years to rise again, and this time, my friends, I suggest we let them.

Really, If the South wants to have their own barbaric way free from the controls of our central government, its time to let them go. The same goes for all those survivalist Libertarians in the Mountain states and Southwest. They can go too.

If anyone in the putative leadership of this country were willing to have an honest navel gaze, I suspect they might admit that the USA, as now constituted, is ungovernable. We have three hundred million rugged individuas divided by a common language. I think its time to redraw the maps and start over.

Let me suggest that we are really five countries sandwiched between Canada and Mexico. If so, the only way we can avoid a future of chaotic civil wars is by ending the fiction that out of the many we can make one. We no longer have a frontier where those who feel constrained by others can go, and, as a body politic, we are obviously not making decisions based on the best interests of the majority. Our divisions are deep, pervasive and arguably unbridgeable. It is time for the waring regions to declare irreparable differences and agree to an amicable divorce.

We need to recognize that we can only create civil societies with those who share our ideas of civility. Nobody can humanely live in a country in which another culture is constantly trying to impose its reality on them, or vice versa. And thats where we are in America right now.

Personally, I no longer think it is possible work out plausible compromises on major public issues with people who shout down dissenting opinions while believing that the force of arms and the symbol of the cross must subsume the force of diverse ideas and disparate culture. This is a prescription for disaster.

For the sake of argument, let me suggest that we would all be better off if we broke up America into 5 separate countries of about 60 million people each. Those new regional countries would then share relatively common cultures. They might choose to bond with their neighboring confederacies for common defense and trade purposes, much as Europe bonds together in the EU. However, each country would maintain its unique government, culture, self organization.

I have been working on this idea since "W" won in ’04 with a campaign of division and regional animosity. It seemed, at the time, that we had reached a moment when the ideal of bridging our national divides was no longer possible. The events of the past few months with the politics of hate and fear blooming in certain regions have caused me to pull out this idea and dust if off for reconsideration. It is still in formation and will require a lot more in the near future. But, I figured that this was as good a time as any to float it again.

Part of the concept arises from the idea that we can no longer manage the level of complexity required to keep the whole US show running. For a while, I have been fascinated with the concept of complexity theory and the work of Joseph Tainter which basically says that complex societies tend to get more complex until they can no longer manage things, whence they collapse. The Oil Drum has an interesting post in that regard Excerpts from "Peak Civilization: The Fall of the Roman Empire" Posted by Ugo Bardi In this exploration he cites Tainter’s work and the old Club of Rome, Limits to Growth ideas.

Remember the poor Club of Rome. They were right about the limits to growth, but because they weren’t right about the limits being felt in the 1970s, their work was discounted forever. Looks like we are now getting a cultural lesson in the downsides of unfettered growth. The damn machine gets overheated, and we all bounce around like drops of water on a hot skillet.

Right now it feels like the complex machine which is our abundant economy is melting down, burning up and thrashing about inflicting havoc upon many other countries. Our inability to respond to the challenges of the melting environment, chaotic social organization of services, imperial overreach, and economic madness suggests that we have reached the end of our rope and that end is unraveling quickly.

All of this seems to happen with a backdrop of the possible decline of Industrial culture. I was directed by the Arch Druid to an interesting discussion in last week’s Guardian: Is there any point in fighting to stave off industrial apocalypse? In it, Two British intellectuals, Paul Kingsnorth. and George Monbiot argue whether the collapse of civilisation will bring us a saner world.

Admittedly, this seems a diversion from the opening theme of proposing the dis-unification of the American state. Let me bring it back around by suggesting that we are exacerbating the current disfunction in so many of our system by maintaining the illusion that we can continue to bridge our differences. This whole stew of rapid dislocation of the American prospect seems to cross a lot of boundaries. Its really scary seeing how large systems fail, how problems get intertwined and culture creates the ability or inability to respond to large issues forces one to bust one's brain in order to try to figure out a way to see a humanistic solution to the coming disruptions. That brain bust seems to get soothed by the elegance of Small is Beautiful and the notions that appropriate levels of decision making will help all our comfort levels. Is it any wonder then why the idea of downsizing America has an appeal?

Everywhere we are hearing the demand that we need to downsize and downscale the government. A lot of people seem to want their taxes cut along with governmental intrusion in their lives. It seems to me that this shrinkage can either be done by cutting the cojones off the safety net, or, as I would propose, cutting up the country into nations of mare manageable size and common purpose.

On the face of it, one could suspect that a country of 60 million people has to be less complex than a country of 300 million. Moreover, it seems like other countries of about 60 million like France, or Germany or England manage to maintain public health systems, education systems and often even a vibrant economies (though that is a tough pitch for any industrial economy right now).

Dividing up the good ol' US of A into 5 countries each of about 60 million people would make each new country comparable to the many of the best economies in the world. Not only would the size be more manageable the economy viable but, done right, each of these new subdivisions will also have a lot more internal cultural cohesion than the current mess. I have even been thinking about calling these newly formed countries “Cultural Confederacies” because it is possible with greater internal cultural cohesion they could then make their own laws that would better reflect the will of the governed.

Think about it. If you took New England, New York and New Jersey you would have a "nice" country of about 60 million, with a common history of commerce and intellectualism. Call it Yankeeland, . The same would hold true if you combined Northern California, Oregon and Washington into Ecotopia. Imagine the joy in the Old South if Dixie no longer had the damn Yankees telling them what to do. All those Christian Farmers in the Midwest could join with their fellows in the mountain states and deserts down to Los Angeles for to create Libertariana. Finally, the solid industrial heartland from Pennsylvania to Minnesota could form a well Unionized Union.

In five quick radical regionectomies, the newly reduced body politic could have their dreams of less government fulfilled. Within this new division, if those in Dixie wanted to outlaw abortion, and make the 10 Commandments part of their constitution, they could just do it. They could make faith healing a covered benefit in their health care system. Hell, it could be the whole system. The rest of us wouldn’t have to care. Of course when the regional refugees wanted into our new "Socialized" system, we might have to worry about illegal immigrants, but that is a ways off yet.

Obviously there are lots of organizational considerations needed to complete the picture of such a new political geography. I intend to start addressing them in future posts. But I wanted to get the essence of the idea up now, because dammit, its time for some new ideas. So I figured I would put this out there for those of you who take the time to read this. Maybe you will then offer your own suggestions, critiques and refinements.

Its just that we seem to have a lot of work to do right now to fix the world and the awful inequities building up. That work won't get done in the political system as now constituted. So I figure its worth presenting alternative ideas to try to focus our attention on ways out of the current paralysis.

In recognizing the scope of work we have ahead, I would also like to tip my hat to Jim Kuntsler, who did a wonderful job in his current post Reality Receding. He lays out the real tasks at hand for the near future. I think it would be easier to address this list in a re-organized American continent, but for the hell of it, I will end by just reprinting his run on laundry list.

we have to rescale the activities of daily life to a level consistent with the mandates of the future, especially the ones having to do with available energy and capital. We have to dismantle things that have no future and rebuild things that will allow daily life to function. We have to say goodbye to big box shopping and rebuild Main Street. More people will be needed to work in farming and fewer in tourism, public relations, gambling, and party planning. We have to make some basic useful products in this country again. We have to systematically decommission suburbia and reactivate our small towns and small cities. We have to prepare for the contraction of our large cities. We have to let the sun set on Happy Motoring and rebuild our trains, transit systems, harbors, and inland waterways. We have to reorganize schooling at a much more modest level. We have to close down most of the overseas military bases we're operating and conclude our wars in Asia. Mostly, we have to recover a national sense of common purpose and common decency.

Cultural Confederacies anyone?

Dark night of the Soul

Maybe it’s the waters. Maybe it was the extended heat wave or the fires raging in the west. Or, maybe it’s the loss of that wonderful optimist, Ted Kennedy. Whatever it is, I am finding myself pulled down into the abyss of cynicism and despair over our ability to actually turn around the awful state of affairs. The workers keep losing their jobs while the bankers keep getting their bonuses. The percentage of Carbon Dioxide keeps climbing past the environmental a base line limit of 350ppm

What strikes me the hardest is, that I have grown so cynical of the oligarchy and the possibility of meaningful response from the American public, that it has become almost impossible to dredge up any meaningful optimism. (hence the name of this blog). I keep wondering how to get even the people I know and love to start looking behind the illusions which inform their decisions.

Maybe you know what I mean. Its one thing to understand that the bastards in power are sucking us all dry with their financial games and lies. Its quite another to get it that this blood sucking will eventually influence our very personal lives, not just those others in the news. Everyone seems to keep making their financial and consumption decisions as if they each live in a uniquely protected bubble. When this comes apart we will all have to start living differently, and it probably won't be so much fun!

Have you noticed how many towns are laying off teachers and cutting back services? Even high end suburbs, near cities which still have an economic base, are starting to feel the pinch. Last week the Boston suburb of Lexington (voted one of the best school districts in MA) announced that they must cut the school department by 50. Wait till next year.

When are people going to get it? Their world is crumbling around them and there are no resources to buy back the compromised lawmakers. Whether it is in health care, or global warming, or delusional economics, there is no one funding the good guys. All the money is on the side of those who will be getting increased profits, and therefore increased status, from whatever addiction or selfish behavior they are selling today. Face it "They" have all the guns n money and that means they own the Congress and the Senate. Those of us on the other side, the liberal do-gooders, who want equity, sanity and health have bubkus.

Well actually we have Move On dot org dunning us for money daily, but that is another matter. I guess I am the sorriest to have learned that the Democratic Party is no longer the stewards of progressive values. They are simply well paid stewards of the same corporate oligarchy which has owned the Republicans for so many years.

You gotta admit there are clear rules in a Market Economy. The ruthless win.

What the ruthless have learned however, is how to use the media system to keep those who haven't won afraid of real change and reform.

Chris Hedges has a wonderful, to the point essay about our own self delusions and which consequential reality comes into focus. The Rise of Gonzo Porn Is the Latest Sign of America's Cultural Apocalypse pretty much hits the nail on the head.

The childish idea that we can always prevail, that reality is never an impediment to what we want, is the central motif of illusion peddled on popular talk shows, by the Christian Right, by Hollywood, in corporate retreats, by the news industry and by self-help gurus. Reality can always be overcome. The future will always be glorious. And held out to keep us amused and entertained are spectacles and celebrities who have become idealized versions of ourselves and who, we are assured, we can all one day become.

The cultural embrace of illusion, and the celebrity culture that has risen up around it, have accompanied the awful hollowing out of the state. We have shifted from a culture of production to a culture of consumption. We have been sold a system of casino capitalism, with its complicated and unregulated deals of turning debt into magical assets, to create fictional wealth for us and vast wealth for our elite. We have internalized the awful ethic of corporatism -- one built around the cult of the self and consumption as an inner compulsion -- to believe that living is about our own advancement and our own happiness at the expense of others.

Danogenes would be hard pressed to find a better summation of the sad state of affairs which confronts us all, and which, ultimately makes any rational political and economic reform almost impossible to imagine. For those of you new here, I also recommend an earlier Hedges article The Truth Alone will not make you Free. from June which really helps raise the question of what role the media can play in manipulating emotions for political gain.

Its nice to see that Mat Taiibi’s work is getting real legs. The recent Columbia Journalism Review Don’t Dismiss Taibbi takes on the whole financial journalism press who was caught looking flatfooted and syncophantic when faced with the awful realities of Goldman Sach’s crimes.

And you wonder why I think Eeyore was an optimist.

Burning Questions

I know I am not serious about this effort at blogging because I can be distracted by life events without notice. For the past week I have been vacationing with Bronwyn in the northwest, refinding her family and my old friends in Alaska. I thought this was going to be a delightful interlude even though it would take me away from the grim demands of my essential Eeyoreness. Little did I know that I was about to be hit upside the head by some harsh effects of climate change.

Before saying more, rest assured that I do know the difference between climate and weather, and yes my recent experiences count as weather, but still… There comes a point when the consistencies of weather begin to provide evidence of climate change. For most of us, the buildup of anomalies in the weather creates that hook in our consciousness where the climate change stories connect. It is my personal experience of those changes which has informed my experience of the past two weeks.

This all started in Portland Oregon, when a family visit was completely disrupted by some of the hottest weather Portland had ever seen. It was 102 when we landed. People said, oh this is awful but don’t worry it always cools down at night. However, it didn’t. Not that night, or the next or the next. It was just hot.. damn hot…. record breaking hot. All anyone could say was: “Portland isn’t really like this.” Uh Huh.

Finally we escaped that heat and flew off to beautiful Juneau Alaska. We landed there in the middle of another heat streak. Well in Juneau, the 80s are hot, but you get the idea. I had been twice before and never really saw the mountains because of the low clouds and rain. This time we saw the mountains and they were gorgeous, that is until the smoke came in.

Monday, we woke up and it looked like pea soup fog. Our friends who have lived here for 30 years said they had never seen fog like this. But it wasn’t fog, it was smoke. Smoke from huge fires burning across the mountains in British Columbia and smoke from half a million acres burning in Fairbanks. Smoke. You can see the difference in the outlook from the pictures below.

Today, we spent the afternoon baking on a beach looking at melting snowfields. Its just weird.

This summer has seem monsoon rains in the northeast, record heat in the northwest, no water in the southwest and blinding smoke in Alaska. Maybe it is just weather, but it sure seems like changes that a greater and deeper. I feel like the complex machine which is our abundant economy is melting down, burning up and trashing about. Perhaps the whole thing is just way too complex.

For a while, I have been fascinated with the concept of complexity theory and the work of Joseph Tainter who basically says that complex societies tend to get more complex until they can no longer manage things, whence they collapse. The Oil Drum has an interesting post in that regard Excerpts from "Peak Civilization: The Fall of the Roman Empire" Posted by Excerpts from "Peak Civilization: The Fall of the Roman Empire" Posted by Ugo Bardi In this exploration he cites Tainter’s work and the old Club of Rome, Limits to Growth ideas. The poor Club of Rome, because they weren’t right about the limits being felt in the 80s, their work was discounted forever. Looks like we are now getting a cultural lesson in the downsides of unfettered growth. The damn machine gets overheated, and we all fry.

Meanwhile, I am happy to note that my good friend Michael Nystrom has gone back to posting the best set of links to the dark side over at Bull Not Bull. Michael and I have a luncheon discussion every couple of weeks about the challenges of our collective visions. He is a “Libertarian” while I am the “progressive”. Yet, at the heart level we are both scared of the same currents washing down the river in which we all swim. Its good to see him back scanning the news.

In the “Told ya” corner, I must admit that I am a bit miffed at the Times this week. In my last post, I shared with you this nice letter I sent them suggesting that they had missed the lead on the Goldman software theft and how they didn’t even bother to thank me. Then, whaddaya know, last week they run a reported piece about the questionable practices of High Frequency trading. They didn’t even give me a footnote. Oh well, at least they covered it, sort of. They still won’t come out and say that Goldman Sachs is a crooked company.

But hey, I was still a week ahead of Jim Kuntsler on this. His blog this week on Syndicated Evil also notes that Goldman Sachs is guilty of stealing customer data and profiting from the theft. It seems to me that it would be nice if Eric Holder were to notice this as well. But that would mean that there could be a snapback on Larry Summers and Tim Giethner, so I won’t hold my breath. Kuntsler seems to echo my feelings about the thing when he muses that if Obama doesn’t do something about this soon he is going to be considered complicit in a much bigger melt down. And, like me, he doesn’t like draw the increasingly obvious conculsions

Readers of this blog know I'm allergic to conspiracy theories. But surveying the scene out there, it is hard to not conclude that Goldman Sachs has become the "front-runner" of a criminal syndicate defrauding US taxpayers.

Anyway, here it is, another hot day in Alaska. The smoke continues to pour over the mountains from British Columbia. I guess we will all just have to get used to it.

July 21 2009 WHAT COLOR ARE YOUR SHOOTS?

Oh - those green shoots keep popping up. The economy must be getting better in spite of so many of us still natter about the chasm yawning at our feet. Apple is making money, though you might ponder that this might arise from some psychedelic shoots. But, the shoots in Texas are a withered brown from the second year of drought. There are few shoots in California's central valley since they cut off the water. Meanwhile everything is certainly green here in New England as we turn into the new temperate rain forest. It wasn't supposed to work this way.

For Goldman Sachs, however, the shoots are of gold, tinged though they are with a bit of blood sucked from the public. I try to be cynical but I just can’t keep up. Since Matt Taibbi’s article a couple of weeks ago, it seems that Goldman Sachs knows exactly where to squeeze to milk more in to its treasure chest.

For instance, check out this Daily Kos article on how this computer code Goldman Sachs has been using gave their computer a split second glimpse of where trades were going and then allowed them to profit from the direction. Talk about Market Manipulation. He ends by saying that Matt Taibbi is an optimist.

So, this article registered on my consciousness as important. Then Friday, the Times prints an article Steal This Code which takes the discussion into the weirdest of dead ends. In fact it is so weird that I start wondering if this could be a corporate strategy to redirect attention away from the story by making it kind of a trivialized spite thing. It seems like the story required some rebuttal, so I sent a letter.

To the NY Times

It was sad to see the Times miss the real story leading to July 17th Op Ed Steal This Code. The piece you printed supposedly provided context to the recent arrest of Sergey Aleynikov for the theft of some important software from his former employer, Goldman Sachs.

Unfortunately, Mr. Osinski's "Steal this Code" provided neither useful context nor additional depth to the story. Rather, it seemed to act as a resume piece for Mr. Osinski's personal software chops and giving him a soapbox to steer the public conversation away from the real blockbuster of a story. The real lead seems to be that Goldman Sach's itself was using the disputed software for theft on a truly grand scale.

For the past week there has been significant blog traffic regarding a story which was posted on the Daily Kos. When you learn what this software really does, you might understand why we should all be worried about its implications.

The "stolen" software gives Goldman Sachs an unfair advantage by allowing it to "front run" electronic trades. Simply put, they can use their massive computer might to sniff the data in millions of daily individual stock trades. Goldman can do this because they control so many broker data lines connecting into the major markets. Using mere milliseconds, their computers could tell the nature of the trade and respond by initiating Goldman Sachs counter-trades which would then arrive at market simultaneously with the "stolen" trades. Such an infinitesimal timing edge on each of the millions of daily trades provided Goldman Sachs with a hundred million dollars in extra "profits" per month.

In essences they were profiting by stealing information from the people and companies who sent electronic trades through their system.

However, rather than trying to protect the public's interest in such massive theft, you choose to print some useless insight into the nature of software authoring. Perhaps the New York Times might fear advertiser punishment should it print a story which says; "Goldman Sachs is profiting from theft".

This is too bad because right now, stories of Goldman Sachs criminality would really sell some papers.

Respectfully.

The Times has yet to thank me for my comments. Go Figure.

Daily, I stare in wonder at the green shoots brigade, blossoming with financial company profits, tout the investment opportunities available in the stock market, while the number of storefronts in Lexington with FOR LEASE signs just keep growing.

President Obama is crowing about pulling us back from the brink of financial disaster.

I want some of whatever they are smoking.

Speaking of altered states, it seems to me that we are starting to see the generational reinvention of a bunch of values that those of us on the activist left during the 60s thought we had invented. If you want to go back to the Romantics and the Transcendentalists, they thought they had invented them as well. One interesting article that spins off from that was found on Huffington this week where Ryan Grim connects Apple’s Steve Jobs to the Hoffman, the discoverer of LSD. The implication is that much of the computer revolution was fueled by enhanced perceptions gained in said altered states. I like it.

Actually, there are some interesting green shoots starting to emerge. Friday night, Bill Moyers Journal had on a couple of young environmental activists who seemed more ready to take on the system than the last generation or two’s. It left me with a brief moment of frission as these youngsters seemed less ready to compromise for real change than their parents.

Another sign of optimism, to me at least, also came from, Who’d a thunk it, the Harvard Business Review. They ran a fun piece by Umahir Haque, The Generation M Manifesto, where he tries to have a positive vision of what the Boomers have done to screw things up, and what the next generation (sic) needs to do about it. It’s a nice vision, and visions are needed, but we still have to find someplace which is tying together the possible.

Sometimes you don’t have to go outside the mainstream to see the future, just look with a different eye. For instance, the NY Times ran a story about Korean professionals who are taking menial jobs like as fishermen and farmers, and lying to their families about their job status. It kinda reminds me of the reality two years hence when many of us current professionals will be learning the joys of farming and subsistence living while still pretending that our next great professional challenge is just around the corner.

The problem is, so many of the efforts that fed our “hope” have lost their way.

Today, like many of you, I got another Move On solicitation to help support Obama's health care plan.

And I was also supposed to call Senators Kennedy and Kerry to make sure they supported it.

Oh, and could I donate something to help support the effort to support the plan?

I thought about it for a while, then I burrowed many layers deep into their website to share a comment.

===================

Dear Move On.org

Guys

I am having a real hard time with the request for donations to support a health plan I don't support.

I worked for Obama, I gave, but now I am waiting for Obama to actually provide some leadership. I am waiting for him to come before the American people and start telling the truth about the inability of Congress to respond on not only health care, but also global warming and the war.

Congress is going to take this guy down because they are owned by somebody else than the American public. Obama has to say so.

I come from Mass, so big deal, I get to call Kennedy Kerry and Markey who already on Obama's side. They would even support him if he took on the Congress.

It looks to me like the corporate bosses informed the New President last January that he had "just the most adorable family". They would sure be sorry if anything happened to that family because security lapsed....

This health care bill doesn't do a thing to control the costs and seems to be a way a way of transferring a lot of working people's monies to the medical industry, insurance company management and the drug monopolies.

When Obama starts talking about how these guys own the Congress and until the country starts understanding which congressmen and senators are sucking on the corporate tit, nothing that the citizens want to happen will, and it is their congresspersons fault. When he does that, I will start donating again.

Thanks

==============

I feel for Barack Obama, I really do. He is hung out there trying so hard not to be an angry black guy and run to the middle, and he is being rolled. The guys who know how to make messages have a bigger brain trust than he does. Sorry guy!

You don’t think so?

Check out this website where you can store your weighty soul. The even advertised it as the real thing in the New Yorker. The thing is really a marketing ploy for a movie.

Obama doesn’t have a chance.

July 6 2009 Week of the Living Dead.

In the past week, the mainstream American media descended into the vampire’s crypt feeding off the manufactured grief for the ghoulish public feasting on the cult of dead Michael Jackson, More screams echoed out of DC’s granite mausoleums as the financial and pharmaceuticals industry sucked the blood out of the movement for real health care reform while the petroleum industry feasted on the dead souls of their Congressional minions who had dutifully drained the last bit of vitality out of the climate bill.

For the week’s other freak show, we all watched in fascination as the walking dead victims begged for blood during the sentencing of the first of the hedge fund vampires, Bernie Madoff. Even satan couldn’t sell Bernie’s soul on E-Bay. Meanwhile, the US foreign policy establishment seems to be channeling the spirit of the British Raj with its failure to understand why great powers get spit out by Afganistan. At the end of the week it even looks like Wall St is finally giving up the ghost this spectral rally where the green shoots were merely badly lit slime mold.

Over in the less trodden fields of the media landscape, the other than mainstream press was trying to direct some healing sunlight on stories that may have more relation to the reality we, the living, actually experience.

Rather than the festivals of blood and circuses, people might find some serious analysis on who has really sabotaged the economy, why the environment keeps getting worse and where our citizenly attention needs to be focused elsewhere. For any of you who seem to be discovering that the stories and themes handed out by television and the news magazines doesn’t seem to be related to the world you inhabit, maybe you will find some of the following of interest.

A must read of the week is Matt Taibbi’s piece in Rolling Stone The Great American Bubble Machine, or how Goldman Sachs has engineered almost every great financial rip off of the past 90 years. Its not like those of us with a dark turn of mind didn’t know this, but the way that Taibbi digs into the history of Goldman’s machinations is refreshing in its detail and comprehension. You will learn how Goldman created one of the great schemes which helped usher in the crash of 1929, how they perfected the art of IPO pump and dump to spur on the Internet bubble, how they helped create the great derivatives machine which led to the hundreds of billions of our federal dollars going into the TARP bailout. Not only that but you will begin to understand why the presence of Larry Summers and Tim Geithner at the White House is part of the great Goldman Sachs plan to transfer even more of our treasury to their pockets.

This article is a follow on to Taibbi’s The Big Takeover from the March 19 Rolling Stone, where he did a great job of showing how the oligarchy is manipulating the financial system to make sure that they suck up not only our personal income but also hoover out the Federal budget through their chokehold on the banking system and their Mafia style control of all our Federal regulators.

Think of a sort of refined WASP / Jewish Mafia when you think of the current governments ties to the financial oligarchy.

If the Taibbi article wasn’t enough, Alexander Cockburn has posted The Wall St White House with an almost mind numbing catalog of all the Goldman Sachs consiglierie who have been placed in key positions in the Obama administration. It’s this almost Medieval hierarchy of influence which exercises its divine rights to money while the so called Fourth Estate snoozes fitfully at the feet of its masters who can turn off or on the advertising dollars like the filp of a whip.

If you are new to this alternate view of things and think that so much talk about a Mafia or an oligarchy is so much sour grapes, you might be interested in Simon Johnson’s article The Quiet Coup in the May Atlantic. Johnson is an MIT economist who I definitely a reluctant critic of the current economic system. On the other hand he clearly lays out a description of how a small oligarchy of financial services honchos have taken complete control of our future and are milking all of us to their personal benefit.

Never to be outdone with a metaphor, Frank Rich in the NY Times yesterday tried to put a warning shot over Wall St by reminding the bankers why the cold blooded killer John Dillinger was so popular in the 30s. Dillinger robbed from the banks that robbed from the poor. The financial services folks may have need to remember this lesson over the next year.

For those of you who want a little more abstract grounding with your doom reports, we would also suggest keeping up with Michael Greer and his Archdruid Report. This week he turn his view to the failures of traditional economics in comprehending the breakdown in our supplies of natural resources. In reading classic economics texts he discovers that there is no room for the ideas of Peak Oil or resource depletion because the basic assumption of the discipline is to assume that increased demand and price for any resource will necessarily then create more supply, simply by the magic of the market. From there he reintroduces EF Schumachers concept of what is really important in any productive economy.

“a hard distinction between what he called primary goods and secondary goods. Secondary goods are the goods and services provided by human labor, the ordinary subject of economic theory. Primary goods are the goods and services provided by nature, and they make the production of secondary goods possible.”

It is a very good and direct analysis and well worth the read.

Dimitri Orlov brought a unique view of the current crisis of economy and resources in last years “Reinventing Collapse” which draws extensive analogies between the current US economic decline and the Russian decline of the early 90s. In his current Club Orlov post he goes further in exploring the probable near term realities of the peak oil crisis by showing what happens when the current exporting countries need to pull back exports to meet internal needs for energy. The macro effect in the world markets won’t be pretty. His basic message is that the severe dislocations from peak oil are coming a lot faster than anyone wants to believe.

For people who like to look behind the curtain at how the oligarchy controls our thoughts and keeps us from even looking at what is really happening, Chris Hedge’s article “The Truth Alone will not Set You Free” in Truthdig is really powerful. He explores the ways that the media convinces us that democratic freedom is rooted in our ability to make consumer choices. Much of his article explores the work of Stewart Ewan (author of Captains of Consciousness) who has made a lifelong study of how the media and public relations has corrupted our abilities to function as citizens. The core concept here is that our mediated masters have learned how to control our emotional response to certain ideas and issues so thoroughly that most of us are incapable of rationally responding to logical argument. This is such total control that we have proved incapable of practicing the democracy that we thought was our birthright. Control of the emotional concept means that good rational liberals can mount all the evidence possible needed fo people to understand the threats of global warming, concentrations of huge wealth, declining resources and international diplomacy, but these arguments will fall on deaf ears if the other side controls the emotional filters by which people hear a debate.

If you would like to truly want to understand how this filtering works and what must be done to challenge the current systems of control, George Lakoff’s work goes another step in laying out how our irrational frames of understanding overcomes the supposed power of rational and objective truth. “The Political Mind” is based on Lakoff’s background in linguistics and mathematics, and therefore provides a depth of understanding which goes beyond most of the emotion based bloggers who rail at the perpetual idiocy of the American electorate.

One of the great ongoing debates of the darkside is the future direction of money and investments. To put it into a quick reference thumbnail, the is the gold bug camp which sees the run up of the huge Federal Debt along with overlapping commodity bubbles leading to a coming bout of hyperinflation. There seem to be any number of these gold bugs who generally include a large dose of Libertarian rhetoric with their financial analysis. One of the most fun and provocative is the Mogambo Guru at the Daily Reckoning. This week he notes that if one digs into the numbers which get reported as the current savings rate (7% seemingly) then the compound earnings of the S&P is something like a negative 25%. Basically you are bound to loose 25 cents on every dollar you invest in stocks right now. He always notes that “we are so freaking doomed”.

Countering the gold bug inflationists are the smaller number of deflationists. The lead blog here is Mish’s Global Economic Trend Analysis, where Mike Shedlock holds forth on the current financial news and provides charts and graphs which prove his thesis that all assets are deflating and that the only rational place to put your cash is, well, cash. Where Mish is important is that he seems to have a good track record and does not seem at all blinded by the self serving sales crap which seems to be the hallmark of most investment sites.

One site, however, takes the cake for doom and gloom economic analysis. This is Urban Survival, posted daily by George Ure somewhere in E Bumsquat Texas. George gets up at 5 early morning to post by 9AM ET and seems to do more typing in 3 hours than most of us can do in a day or two. He seems to have a constant scanner on internet and other news sources and manages to link to more conspiracy theories and weird Area 47 connections than seem reasonable. What makes George notable and even gives him a decent prediction track record, is his connection to these strange geeks with a computer program he calls “the rickety time machine”. The program scans the web for language patterns which can be turned into predictions of coming events. Right now Ure and his Time Monks are predicting a complete market crash starting in August and deepening into the Fall. This will be coupled with a swine flu pandemic and a breakdown of the social order. In this environment George doesn’t want to pick either gold or cash, but rather food and tools. He is a really odd, educated survivalist who believes that the excrement is right now hitting the fan. CYA now!

Ya gotta admit that you can’t get much darker than that.